The question of what to do with the Democratic delegates from Michigan and Florida is being hashed out today. The Rules Committee is holding a hearing to decide what the punishment should be, if any, for those two states BREAKING PARTY RULES and moving their primaries ahead of the official party schedule.
Clinton supporters are whining that all those votes should be counted, despite the fact that Obama didn't campaign in those states (which Clinton did, which is a violation of those same party rules), and wasn't even on the ballot in Michigan. The funny thing is, these are the same rules that the Clinton Campaign AGREED to before the votes began, and now that it looks like she may be hurt by them, Oh the INJUSTICE! The HORROR! The DISENFRANCHISEMENT!!
Clinton, and your banshees at the hearing today, sit down and shut up.
Crooks and Liars is streaming the hearing, for anyone who wants to listen in.
May 31, 2008
The FL & MI Fiasco
May 30, 2008
Can We Really Eliminate a Virus? The Polio Puzzle
On Wednesday a milestone was established in the fight for the eradication of polio. It has been one year since the last reported case of the childhood disease in Myanmar (data usually takes a month or two to collect so this may change). That makes two countries this year, the other being Somalia, who have surpassed a year without an outbreak in 2008. Currently polio is endemic in four countries: Pakistan, India, Afghanistan, and Nigeria. The organizations who fight the disease encounter a two-fold challenge in each of these countries; immunize all children under 5 with enough doses to be effective, and contain the disease within the country until it can be eliminated. These challenges are further complicated by war, political insecurity, famine and distrust of medicine. To overcome these roadblocks and eliminate the disease will require supreme diligence and innovative ideas from those on the ground in these last few strongholds which continue to spawn cases of polio.
The press to eradicate polio across the globe started in 1988. The World Health Organization (WHO), Rotary International, UNICEF, and most developed countries (with the US far and ahead with greater than $1,000 million US donated so far) set out to conquer the disease that was endemic to over 125 countries. 20 years later only 4 countries suffer through a constant battle to interrupt transmission. 10 other countries reported infections in 2007 and all but 2 have had cases this year (the total cases to-date in 2008 is 453 globally).
One major factor standing in the way of success in many of these countries is political instability and war. Afghanistan and Somalia, as well as parts of Pakistan and Ethiopia, suffer from armed conflicts that make "vaccination logistically difficult and unpredictable at best." But the will of the people on the ground, doctors and volunteers who want to make a difference in their home countries, finds ways to operate around such dangerous situations. Negotiations for 'days of tranquility' (the suspension of hostilities in order to allow for vaccination) have been successful in Sudan and previously in Somalia and Ethiopia. These individuals show great courage and determination in the face of a major roadblock. Many times simply receiving and delivering vaccinations with the workers is a strain on the patience with multiple searches and questions. Soldiers don't take to kindly to strangers, especially those who create large crowds of citizens. But there are success stories from countries with far worse conditions than any face today. Bangladesh, Vietnam, Rwanda, and Zimbabwe all offered serious problems. Polio was eradicated from Angola in the midst of a civil war. In 2002 an outbreak in Kandahar was stopped by a WHO-led mop up crew despite the Afghan war. Currently Afghanistan faces challenges with a power struggle happening in the country. Basic supplies are in short order, many parts are barren or hard to reach by vehicle, and regional conflict has made most villages wary of any outsiders. This final roadblock presents a whole new challenge for the eradication efforts.
Once the organizations have been allowed to organize a vaccination effort the ground campaign must begin to recruit trained medical personnel and volunteers to monitor and administer the vaccine. A huge part of this effort is to inform citizens of the intentions and purpose of the operation. Dr. Atul Gawande, a surgeon from the United States, traveled to his family's native India after his residency to volunteer in the fight against polio. In his book, Better: A Surgeon's Notes on Performance, Gawande writes,One difficulty came up repeatedly--from local doctors, from villagers, from workers trudging house to house. The question was: Why? Why this huge polio campaign when what we need is--fill in the blank here--clean water (diarrheal illness kills 500,000 Indian children per year), better nutrition (half of children under three have stunted growth), working septic systems (which would help prevent polio as well as other diseases), irrigation (so a single rainless season would not impoverish farming families)? We saw neighborhoods that had had outbreaks of malaria, tuberculosis, cholera. But no one important had come to visit in years. Now one case of polio occurs and the infantry marches in?
There are no simple answers to this question because truly the access to clean water, or good nutrition would save a larger number of children than polio eradication ever will. I know I would have trouble answering questions like that, I know I would explain I was there to do what I could, and polio eradication has been decided as what I can do. An old saying explains a better reason maybe; if you're starving, becoming paralyzed certainly isn't going to help. While it is harsh it is true, the doctors on the ground are just following what they can do to help. These guys are truly what makes the eradication goal a feasible one, the ability to organize and convince the population of the importance in the face of true struggle is a skill that a large organization cannot achieve, only in small step swill individuals gain the trust of an entire population.
Perhaps the goal of global eradication of polio is an absurd ambition, India alone creates a new pool of potential polio victims the size of Venezuela's entire population. Staying caught up means organizing a mammoth campaign to immunize every child under 5, and the cost has been overwhelming. So far about $3 billion has been spent worldwide, more than six hundred dollars a case. To put that in perspective the total health care budget for India's government in 2003 amounted to four dollars per person. The truth is, no cost-benefit analysis calculus can assure us just now that the money is well spent. But this remains a task that as a civilization we can do that would benefit mankind forever. The eradication of smallpox was a gift from the previous generation to all who are to come, and now, perhaps, the eradication of polio can, too. But it will be achieved on the backs of those on the ground who represent a monument to the perfection of performance, showing what can be achieved through diligent detail coupled with great ambition.
MSNBC: "US opts out of cluster bomb treaty"
Did ya'll get that title? I almost shot oatmeal out of my nose when I read that (I was eating breakfast, oatmeal is not some disturbing euphemism). Cluster bombs are a pretty nasty piece of military hardware, capable of wreaking havoc over a large area due to the deadly "bomblets" which shower over the target after the initial detonation. Their military value is obvious, but the downside is the usual tragedy of civilian woe.Their devastating impact on the battlefield often comes at a terrible cost to civilians afterward, including farmers who strike unexploded “bomblets” in their fields or children who mistake the objects for playthings.
Playthings? I mean, American parents will sue someone to smithereens if their child scrapes their knee on the playground, but evidently we have no problem letting all those brown "fer-ner's" kids play baseball with unexploded military ordinance. Our nation, along with Russia, China, Israel, India and Pakistan, decided not to sign the ban, despite over 100 countries adopting the measure. Evidently, our nation would rather let a couple thousand more kids die than give up one of our many toys. Our rationale:While the United States shares the humanitarian concerns of those in Dublin, cluster munitions have demonstrated military utility, and their elimination from US stockpiles would put the lives of our soldiers and those of our coalition partners at risk.
Because refraining from using one type of bomb is gonna ensure a "terra-ist" victory, or commie victory, or illegal immigrant victory, or which every enemy Eurasia is at war with at the moment. Why don't we try equipping our soldiers with actual body armor and IED resistant vehicles, and then worry about whether or not a lack of cluster bombs will endanger our fighting men and women?
Ah, then we find that the Bush Administration, SURPRISE!, might have another reason to oppose this life-saving ban. They've been using cluster bombs to fight...well...AQI, the Insurgents, whoever...in Iraq for years, and Gawd knows, we can't do anything which might hamper Dubya's exercise in prideful ignorance in the Middle East.
For the record, Obama has come out in support of a ban on cluster bombs, while Hilary has not. Screw all those little kids, right Hil? If they were Americans, they'd be young or a minority, so they would probably be voting for Obama anyway. Way to be a leader....
May 29, 2008
Which Coast Are We On Again?
Following close on the heals of California's move to legalize gay marriage, a surprising second step could take place in the slow progression towards marriage equality for all Americans. It seems that New York could soon require that all state agencies recognize gay marriages performed legally elsewhere. Obviously, this does not mean that gay and lesbian couples will be able to marry in the Big Apple, but if they decide to move there after a magical Manhattan honeymoon, their San Fran wedding will carry all the legal and financial benefits of a traditional marriage.
State agencies, including those governing insurance and health care, must immediately change policies and regulations to make sure "spouse," "husband" and "wife" are clearly understood to include gay couplesThis is extremely important, as the old argument that Civil Unions were "just as good" as a marriage has been proven as full of holes as the "separate but equal" argument of the 60's, precisely due to legal differences between the two terms.
It is encouraging to see more of the country begin to realize that marriage should be defined by love, not the State. Speaking for myself, I wish all the new couples in California, and perhaps in NY, good luck and all the best. And props to New York Governor David Paterson for his help in winning this important battle for equality in a nation that badly needs it.
May 28, 2008
CIA Torture Document Almost Completely Redacted
The ACLU received the documents through an ongoing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit related to the treatment of prisoners in US custody overseas. That's right, the only words on the page are "These enhanced techniques include:" and "waterboard". Pretty good stuff guys...
May 27, 2008
Clinton...Exit Stage Left
Alright Tye, I get the point.
So I return from my hiatus a hair's breadth before Tye's editorial ax falls. My apologies Readers, now successfully-resolved medical issues prompted my absence, and I fell out of my favorite habit. It has been a drab 3 weeks without my time here, and honestly, my newfound productivity at work has made my employers suspicious. Its past time to get back to it.
On to what matters.
Who is this Hillary Clinton-person and what the hell is she doing in the race at this point? I think its fairly obvious, as so many have noted, that Obama will be the Democratic Nominee, but the noise is getting a little angry. I have yet to hear a convincing argument for her remaining in the competition, and once you begin basing the success of your candidacy on the tasteless, tragic hope (can we even call that a hope?) that your opponent might be assassinated, I'm going to just say that you have lost. You are out of you mind to believe anything further she does in this primary campaign is for the benefit of anyone other than Hillary Clinton. I fear that there is nowhere else for the Democratic primary to go but down, and Hillary is definitly playing the anchor in this play. I've been hearing a great deal of rhetoric being thrown in Obama's direction, and I have to assume that it would be easier for him to battle John McBush without the point of Clinton's knife, metaphorically speaking, pressed against his back.
What Does the Hannah Poling Case Prove?
Ok, that's a lot of medical mumbo jumbo, here's the important part; the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). This program was created in 1986 because lawyers had sued almost all pharmaceutical companies out of existence, claiming vaccines were the reason for cases of sudden infant death syndrome to epilepsy. By the time it came into existence there was only one manufacturer of the diptheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine left in the market. The government stepped in with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which included the creation of the VICP. The Act called for an excise tax on every vaccine and the VICP compiled a list of compensable injuries. If studies supported the notion that vaccines caused a negative reaction -- thrombocytopenia after receipt of measles containing vaccine -- children and their families were given a fair reimbursement quickly and fairly. The number of lawsuits against vaccine makers decreased.
Unfortunately the VICP has recently turned its back on science. In 2005 a woman successfully claimed that a tetanus vaccine caused her optic neuritis. Although there was no evidence, published or otherwise, to support her claim, the VICP ruled that if a petitioner proposed a biologically "plausible" mechanism by which a vaccine could cause harm, as well as a logical sequence of cause and effect, an award should be granted. This opened the door to compensation being given for a whole new host of conditions which have no set of data to prove or disprove the claims.
In 2006 the VICP deviated farther from its original standards than it ever had before when Dorothy Werderitsh successfully claimed that a hepatitis B vaccine caused her multiple sclerosis. By the time of the ruling, several studies had shown that the hep B vaccine neither caused nor exacerbated the disease, and the Institute of Medicine even concluded that "evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship between the two." But the VICP was less impressed by the scientific literature than it was with an expert's proposal of a mechanism by which hep B vaccine could induce autoimmunity (an ironic conclusion, given that Dorothy Wederitsh never had a detectable immune response to the vaccine).
Here are some facts: Natural infections will exacerbate autism spectrum disorder in patients with mitochondrial enzyme deficiencies (what Hannah Poling has), vaccines haven't shown the same. Children with this disorder are especially susceptible to infection so it is recommended they receive all vaccines.
A belief that multiple vaccines overwhelm the immune system is floating around the anti-vax camp. But a century ago children received one vaccine, smallpox, which contained 200 structural and nonstructural proteins. Today, the 14 vaccines given to children contain a total of 150 immunologic components.
Maybe the most important point of this case is that the government has eroded the confidence in the vaccination system without any concrete evidence of mass panic. The problem with letting a few kids skip out or having parents opt out of vaccination compromises herd immunity, a pillar of the vaccination theory. Consequences should be weighed next time a decision like this is made instead of caving to media and political pressure, a precedent has been laid down.
The Veeping Villow...Confronting the Democratic Conundrum
First off, I want to thank Tye and Deano for allowing me to join the team and throw out some great posts. Lets get to it!!
As the end of the primary season draws near, a huge question is on the horizon: Obama's VP selection. The importance of this selection cannot be understated. This decision as we all know needs to shore up Obama on several fronts. The selection has to make him more formidable on national security issues and curtail fears about his experience. By experience, I do not mean governance, I mean pulling the trigger on a daunting choice, where he truly does trail his competitors. The VP choice also needs to bridge the ever more apparent Obama/Clinton divide. I know that many are calling for an Obama/Clinton ticket. This is a very sharp double edged sword. It would unify the party behind both, in addition it would unify an ailing republican base. The strengths of a Obama/Clinton partnership are negligible while the weaknesses are apparent even to the blind. The dislike of the Clintons will overshadow the GOP's disdain of McCain.
I've looked over the literature about the different options. I firmly believe that former NATO commander Wes Clark is a perfect fit. He is experienced on the International scene along with many years of military service. He is a Clinton surrogate and more importantly he's not a career politician, he's a general, which should mitigate McCain's military virtues. A Obama/Clark ticket becomes very appealing to "upper crust" democrats as well as Midwest blue collar voters. Such a decision, should appease the Clinton wing of the party and diversify the pull of the overall ticket.
Any questions or comments are always welcome even stupid ones....
AK out
Clinton...Exit Stage Left
Alright Tye, I get the point.
So I return from my hiatus a hair's breadth before Tye's editorial ax falls. My apologies Readers, now successfully-resolved medical issues prompted my absence, and I fell out of my favorite habit. It has been a drab 3 weeks without my time here, and honestly, my newfound productivity at work has made my employers suspicious. Its past time to get back to it.
On to what matters.
Who is this Hillary Clinton-person and what the hell is she doing in the race at this point? I think its fairly obvious, as so many have noted, that Obama will be the Democratic Nominee, but the noise is getting a little angry. I have yet to hear a convincing argument for her remaining in the competition, and once you begin basing the success of your candidacy on the tasteless, tragic hope (can we even call that a hope?) that your opponent might be assassinated, I'm going to just say that you have lost. You are out of you mind to believe anything further she does in this primary campaign is for the benefit of anyone other than Hillary Clinton. I fear that there is nowhere else for the Democratic primary to go but down, and Hillary is definitly playing the anchor in this play. I've been hearing a great deal of rhetoric being thrown in Obama's direction, and I have to assume that it would be easier for him to battle John McBush without the point of Clinton's knife, metaphorically speaking, pressed against his back.
Open Call to Political Bloggers
Since we've lost Dean its time for me to pick up another political correspondent. If you search through the site you can see the views of the site and if its something you'd be interested in, let me know. I'm looking for someone who can put up 3 articles a week, shouldn't be more than a 2 hour commitment. Thanks for looking guys, hope to hear from some of you.
May 25, 2008
The Birth of a Virus, a First in Science
Although it doesn't look like much, this image is a first in science. The white spots you see are individual HIV particles assembling on the surface of an infected cell. A biophysicist and a virologist from Rockefeller University used a specialized microscope that only illuminates the surface of a cell. The work was published in the May 25 advanced online issue of Nature.
First a quick look at why this is groundbreaking. Usually light microscopes work by shining light directly through the cell, illuminating everything, inside and at the surface of the cell. The researchers brought the beam's path to a steeper angle which reflected the light's energy off of the cell's surface instead of passing through it. The result is an incredibly detailed look at what is going on at the cell's surface without having to filter out all of the other things going on inside the cell. The two researchers were the first to see a real-time view of a single particle of the HIV virus. A single infectious unit of the disease that has killed over 25 million in the last 25 years. This is the first time a virion has been imaged, and it just happened to be one of the most debilitating and worrying diseases of our time. The researchers found that it takes five to six minutes to assemble a single HIV particle.
This isn't going to be life-changing (although it may be groundbreaking) but it will help to confirm some details about virion production that have been inferred through other techniques. I just like the image and think it was a pretty innovative approach for visualizing virus assembly. The experiments definitely weren't hard or complicated and the simplicity of the experiment captures the elegance of innovation. Simply looking at a familiar process from a slightly different perspective gave simple and clear images of exactly what's going on at the cell surface, pretty cool stuff.
1 comments:
Post a Comment